Long-time print-oriented vendor from Sweden today still focuses on those roots, even as it rolls out digital Content Management System (CMS) capabilities
- Atex has a long history with automating news production, with a deep understanding of newsrooms, though the firm has undergone many changes and the digital toolset is evolving slowly
- Best fit for its digital CMS lies with mid-sized, independent news organizations, still centered primarily on print and only secondarily on digital
- Customers include la Repubblica (Italy), El País (Spain), the Daily Mail and Metro (UK), and the Sydney Morning Herald (Australia).
Likely fit
Atex’s complexity limits it to medium to large publishers that need to manage both digital and print, and need a highly tailored and custom approach for individual publications. Atex is not particularly suited to digital only publications or publishers that require extensive content sharing across multiple publications.
At a glance
Primary Customer Fit
Mid-sized Independent News Organization
Secondary Fit
Large News Organization
Most Active Geographies
EMEA
Official Support Hours
Help Desk support during office hours
24/7/365 on-call support for production critical issues
Officially Supported Languages for User Interface
English, Italian, German, French, Spanish, Turkish
Third-party Language Support Available?
No
License Model
Subscription license (SaaS) based on users, storage, and web traffic Perpetual license based on users plus additional support and maintenance license to get access to updates and bug fixes
Scope Summary
Focused on content production for print and digital, with some basic digital front-end functionality, but no revenue generation features out of the box
Tech Base
Java (Tomcat), Docker, GraphQL API, NextJS/React
Cloud Model
SaaS in AWS
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Head Count
150
- MyType, Saas for small ish digital players
- Integrated AI features
- MyType Newsbeat (news gathering)
What customers report
- Tight integration between digital and print, including print previews within the browser
- Comprehensive toolset can be extensively tailored to the needs of a publisher in close cooperation with Atex
- Content editing in Desk feels familiar to editors
- Implementations can be slow and hard to scale, especially if print is part of the workflow
- Outdated architecture can prove difficult to run, even if Atex is slowly updating this
- Treating the article body as one block of content works well for editors, but can be hard to publish across channels when shared between digital and print
- Platform is not particularly suited to sharing content across different publications
- The ACE CMS remains very much in development and doesn’t always feel like a finished product
Background
- Atex was founded in 1973 in the U.S. and produced one of the first electronic (paperless) platforms for the news industry. The company has since undergone multiple major changes, having been owned by Kodak before being spun off again as a separate entity. It has acquired several other software companies over the years — notably, Polopoly, a Swedish news-focused web CMS, in 2008. The company HQ moved to the UK, and then Sweden, though key leadership appears to reside in the Milan office. Atex also has offices in Finland, Brazil, Australia, and Singapore. Atex is now an operating group of Canada-based Constellation Software Inc., which buys and holds vertical market software.
- The company continues to support print publication through its “Hermes” and “Prestige” systems, though the focus has shifted to "Desk" (multi-channel authoring) and "ACE" (Atex Content Engine), which includes both a headless CMS and Atex Web as front-end. Editorial staff will generally produce content in Desk, which also allows management of the digital front pages and print editions.
- Atex Desk pivots around the Content Editor, which, although it uses “blobs” of unstructured (HTML) content, can embed content using iFramely for digital. It also includes a Digital Asset Management (DAM) system, Frontpage Editor, and Matik (for photo collages). Atex is one of the few systems that can automatically avoid duplicate headlines on front pages (though this can be overridden).
- Most Atex implementations still run largely on-premise, with the editorial environment, Desk, running in a traditional, Java-based application server. Content can be fed through ACE and ACE Web to manage the web and app front-ends; ACE employs a more modern (largely micro-services based) architecture.
- In terms of fit, Atex’s complexity limits it to medium to large publishers that need to manage both digital and print, and need a highly tailored and custom approach for individual publications. Atex is not particularly suited to digital-only publications or publishers that require extensive content sharing across multiple publications.
- While Atex is being used by many newspapers and publishers around the world, given the breadth of the (legacy) toolset, it can be difficult to tell which tools are getting deployed by each. Implementations tend to have evolved over time and are usually tailored to the customer.
- The company reports that an average system for a newsroom of 50 editors can cost around $110,000 USD for content management and print production. Web site publishing for a property with around 1M page views per month could cost around $18,000 USD per year.
Package scope (as reported by vendor)
Core platform - i.e., bundled in product (yes/no/beta) | Add-On (yes/custom/3rd party) | |
---|---|---|
Content lifecycle: author / classify / edit / approve / publish / re-purpose / archive / dispose
|
Yes
|
|
Basic digital / voice / media asset management
|
Yes
|
|
Support print publishing
|
Yes
|
|
Simple social media re-publishing
|
Yes
|
3rd Party
|
Optional modules: forms / polls / social widgets / etc
|
No
|
3rd Party
|
Connector library (OOTB connectors, APIs, etc.)
|
Yes
|
|
Bundled CDN (with DDOS protection)
|
Yes
|
|
User registration
|
Yes
|
|
Subscription management and fulfillment - digital
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Subscription management - print
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Personalization
|
No
|
3rd Party
|
Ad management - digital
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Ad management - print
|
No
|
Yes
|
Mobile app management
|
No
|
3rd Party
|
Site search
|
Yes
|
|
Content and assignment planning
|
Yes
|
|
Video management / OVP
|
Yes
|
3rd Party
|
Audio management / podcasting
|
Yes
|
3rd Party
|
Data visualization
|
Yes
|
3rd Party
|
Classifieds
|
No
|
|
Commenting / community features/
|
No
|
3rd Party
|
Newsletter production and management
|
No
|
3rd Party
|
Notifications and alerts
|
Yes
|
|
A/B testing
|
No
|
|
SEO
|
Yes
|
|
Multi-title management with variable inheritance
|
Yes
|
|
Complex layout and subsite / subsection cloning
|
Yes
|
|
AR- / VR- enhanced services
|
No
|
|
Public documentation
|
No
|
|
Online user / partner forums
|
No
|
|
Regular user group meetings
|
No
|
|